Android 16 Tablet,11 Inch Tablet with 24GB RAM 128GB...

Most Helpful Review

"First, I'll address the elephant in the room, which is the 'False advertising'.When you list your tablet as '24GB of RAM' and using imagery that says '2TB' you are listing it as 24GB of RAM, and with 2TB of storage. The RAM part is the most egregious because 99.9% of people buying this won't have the tools, know-how, or components required to actually give it the ADVERTISED 24GB RAM.This device is really, 128gb, with 6gb of RAM, and I've included a photo to amend the main picture they use while advertising this tablet.Now, you might be thinking that it's not that bad, since that's pretty standard for tablets in this price range (Which is true, given that the Samsung A11+ goes on sale for less than this).The main difference is that this tablet uses a chipset that was low-mid range from 2022.To put it in perspective, Samsung's A11+ has an Antutu score (basically a hardware test) around 3x higher than this.But you still might be thinking "I don't need a powerful tablet, I just want to watch videos on it".Unfortunately, this tablet has a paltry 800P screen and again using the A11+ as the direct comparison (Because they're in the same price range), the Samsung has a 1080p screen.The larger your screen is, the most important resolution matters. Having 800P on an 8" tablet would be fine, but on an 11" tablet it WILL be noticeable.But back to the chipset and the argument of not needing a powerful tablet:Here's the irony, and a bit of a tangential lesson on how chipsets work in devices:The way you make a chip faster in a device is to make it more efficient.This means that an older, slower chipset will use more power than a newer faster chipset:It sounds counter-intuitive, but that's how it works.So, with that known: Again, the A11+ with a peak performance being 3x higher than this absolutely blows this out of the water.This tablet seems tailor-made to take advantage of people that don't understand tech, or what the actual benchmarks are in this market.It doesn't even use a Helio g99, which has been the standard for 'good enough, but not great' chipsets for cheap tablets.With so many better options available, and the intentionally misleading advertising, I can't recommend this tablet.This tablet should honestly be like 40% less than what they are offering this for, since it's just an amalgamation of outdated components.But even then, you don't get the guaranteed years of security updates as you would from companies like Lenovo or Samsung, so this device would become a brick far faster than the brand name competition.The only actual positives I can see that make this tablet more in-line with modern tablets is that it has a 90hz refresh rate, and that it runs Android 16:But.... I hate to keep mentioning it, but the A11+ does as well."